-
May 7th, 2008, 03:08 AM
#1
Inactive Member
It's been a while since I shot MP film of any format,last time I did anything serious was around the mid 1990's.I got the "bug" to shoot film again a couple of years ago,figuring I would start with checking out my old friend,super 8.I was excited to discover that I could find Beaulieu's on ebay for about 1/10 of what they cost in the 70's,but then with today's cost of film and lab work,the excitement was somewhat short lived.Kind of like buying a ****** for 5 grand when gas is up to 12 bucks a gallon.
I was very impressed with the format and what well a shot piece of super 8 film looks like when transferred on a decent telecine system.I was very disappointed though,in the lack of consistency in quality control with respect to film stocks and lab services.I expected cameras to **** out and having to jerry rig them to keep them running,so I was able to figure in a percentage of lost film due to camera malfunction and came out with an acceptible figure for a labor of love project.Never for anyone I would be expected to be paid for.Calculate the inconsistency I've experienced with tolerance levels on steadiness (think Fuji 50D.Lovely film stock,but hops like a kangaroo in my Canon 814AZ)and film damaged due to something wrong in the cart or bad lab handling and you come up with about 60% success.That is the way I figure it,out of a 50 foot cartridge of whatever stock,I might get 30 useable feet.Yet it doesn't work like that with every cartridge.The first stock I shot out of my 814 was T200 Vision neg.It was old stuff I had kept in my freezer for several years and it was grainy,but that cart was 100% and gorgeous.Then I shot some Fuji Velvia 50D and I posted my dissapointment on this forum.Stunning colors,like Kodachrome on mescaline,but I couldn't live with the unsteadiness.Just recently I gave Ektachrome 100D a try.Here again,awesome colors,love the grain and contrast.Good detail in shadow areas and stable....On about 60% of the cartridge.Toward the end the focus shifted in and out and jumped in the projector gate because somehow the film got BENT and CREASED.Like it had been projected in an auto load projecter and it buckled in one of the feed chambers.Upon examining the film,it looked more like the film had bent during EXPOSURE,leading me to think it had buckled in the cart (bad factory loading?)or during processing.The latter I've ruled out because if it had happened in processing,I would suspect that there would be color shifts at the bend points,but colors are stable through the roll.
I'm about to give up on film alltogether.16mm is out of the question from a financial point of view unless I get funded projects but that's a whole different issue.Recently I played with a tutorial on Magic Bullet and was pretty pleased.My next independent project is going to be on HDV with one of the Canon's (I don't remember which one now)at 24F mode.
I don't remember this nightmare of consistency when we shot film professionally.None of my super 8 projects in the 70's experienced any of the problems associated with the cartridges or lab problems.Back then I shot two industrials,several commercials and a ton of sports analysis films,shot hundreds of cartridges and never once had a bad cart.I've had some film strecth problems and cinch marks from labs,but we all kind of expected that back then with the format.Never had a single problem with 16mm from that perspective either.I've had bad cameras that jammed film and such,but with about the same percentage rate as video cameras I've used failing in the field.
I'm still gonna tinker with film as long as it's being made somewhere and processed,but I seriously doubt I'll be shooting any more than a few rolls here and there.I'm thinking of resurrecting my old Canon Scoopic 16mm and burning a couple of hundred feet.
Some of you folks shooting feature films with super 8,do you experience this much of a footage waste problem?I would be seriously pissed if I had spent several days on a shoot and have 40% lost because the cart was bad.That could kill a whole project.
-
May 13th, 2008, 10:20 AM
#2
HB Forum Moderator
Is it possible that you might be too unwilling to spend any money either getting the cameras serviced or starting with a newer super-8 camera?
I say this only because I have shot 40-50 cartridges with a Canon 1014XLS and other than a couple of very minor problems that were more related to popping film cartridges in and out several times (hair in the gate at one point), and the sun shutter selector position seems to flicker outdoors in bright situations (might just be a factor of a high f-stop), and one time the camera slipped into macro for a wide shot...
But since this happened over 50 cartridges, I consider these very minor instances. So in your situation is it the cartridge, or lack of using a good camera with a good service record or at least one that you knew for sure worked really well prior to the first time you used it?
-
May 16th, 2008, 04:13 PM
#3
Inactive Member
Well Alex,since I bought my Canon 814 AZ from a friend who serviced and worked on cameras,I'm pretty sure that's a safe model to use as a constant.The first two rolls I shot,which was a roll of Tri X reversal,and then a roll of Vision 200 neg,came out fine.When I started using the new stocks,the Fuji Velvia and Ektachrome 100D,that's when I got problems.The Velvia had registration problems and the E100D had the last 15 feet or so "accordian" in places,so I'm pretty sure it's the stock.
I'm told the best bet is to go with stocks made especially7 by Eastman as opposed to "boutique" stocks loaded by someone like Pro 8mm or Spectra.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks